Caelyx
Home >> Caelyx >> Drug Details
Doxorubicin (INN, pronounced /dksrubsn/; trade name Adriamycin; also known as hydroxydaunorubicin) is a drug used in cancer chemotherapy. It is an anthracycline antibiotic, closely related to the natural product daunomycin, and like all anthracyclines it intercalates DNA. It is commonly used in the treatment of a wide range of cancers, including hematological malignancies, many types of carcinoma, and soft tissue sarcomas.
The drug is administered in the form of hydrochloride salt intravenously. It may be sold under the brand names Adriamycin PFS, Adriamycin RDF, or Rubex.[2] It is photosensitive and it is often covered by an aluminum bag to prevent light from affecting it.
History
The history of doxorubicin can be traced back to the 1950s, when an Italian research company, Farmitalia Research Laboratories, began an organized effort to find anticancer compounds from soil-based microbes. A soil sample was isolated from the area surrounding the Castel del Monte, a 13th century castle. A new strain of Streptomyces peucetius which produced a red pigment was isolated, and an antibiotic was produced from this bacterium that was found to have good activity against murine tumors. Since a group of French researchers discovered the same compound at about the same time, the two teams named the compound daunorubicin, combining the name Dauni, a pre-Roman tribe that occupied the area of Italy where the compound was isolated, with the French word for ruby, rubis, describing the color.[3] Clinical trials began in the 1960s, and the drug saw success in treating acute leukemia and lymphoma. However, by 1967, it was recognized that daunorubicin could produce fatal cardiac toxicity.[4]
Researchers at Farmitalia soon discovered that changes in biological activity could be made by minor changes in the structure of the compound. A strain of Streptomyces was mutated using N-nitroso-N-methyl urethane and this new strain produced a different, red-colored antibiotic. They named this new compound Adriamycin, after the Adriatic Sea, and the name was later changed to doxorubicin to conform to the established naming convention.[5] Doxorubicin showed better activity than daunorubicin against murine tumors, and especially solid tumors. It also showed a higher therapeutic index, yet the cardiotoxicity remained.[6]
Doxorubicin and daunorubicin together can be thought of as prototype compounds for the anthracyclines. Subsequent research by many investigators throughout the world has led to many other anthracycline antibiotics, or analogs, and today, it is estimated that there are over 2,000 known analogs of doxorubicin. By 1991, 553 of them have been evaluated in the screening program at the National Cancer Institute (NCI).[3]
Biosynthesis
Doxorubicin (DXR) is a 14-hydroxylated version of daunorubicin, the immediate precursor of DXR in its biosynthetic pathway. Daunorubicin is more abundantly found as a natural product because it is produced by a number of different wild type strains of streptomyces. In contrast, only one known non-wild type species, streptomyces peucetius subspecies cesius ATCC 27952, was initially found to be capable of producing the more widely used doxorubicin.[7] This strain was created by Arcamone et al. in 1969 by mutating a strain producing daunorubicin, but not DXR, at least in detectable quantities.[8] Subsequently, Hutchinson's group showed that under special environmental conditions, or by the introduction of genetic modifications, other strains of streptomyces can produce doxorubicin.[9] His group has also cloned many of the genes required for DXR production, although not all of them have been fully characterized. In 1996, Strohl's group discovered, isolated and characterized dox A, the gene encoding the enzyme that converts daunorubicin into DXR.[10] By 1999, they produced recombinant Dox A, a Cytochrome P450 oxidase, and found that it catalyzes multiple steps in DXR biosynthesis, including steps leading to daunorubicin.[11] This was significant because it became clear that all daunorubicin producing strains have the necessary genes to produce DXR, the much more therapeutically important of the two. Hutchinson's group went on to develop methods to improve the yield of DXR, from the fermentation process used in its commercial production, not only by introducing Dox A encoding plasmids, but also by introducing mutations to deactivate enzymes that shunt DXR precursors to less useful products, for example baumycin-like glycosides.[7] Some triple mutants, that also over-expressed Dox A, were able to double the yield of DXR. This is of more than academic interest because at that time DXR cost about $1.37 million per kg and current production in 1999 was 225 kg per annum.[12] More efficient production techniques have brought the price down to $1.1 million per kg for the non-liposomal formulation. Although DXR can be produced semi-synthetically from daunorubicin, the process involves electrophilic bromination and multiple steps and the yield is poor.[13] Since daunorubicin is produced by fermentation, it would be ideal if the bacteria could complete DXR synthesis more effectively.
Cartoon diagram of two doxorubicin molecules intercalating DNA, from PDB 1D12.
Mechanism of action
The exact mechanism of action of doxorubicin is complex and still somewhat unclear, though it is thought to interact with DNA by intercalation.[14] Doxorubicin is known to interact with DNA by intercalation and inhibition of macromolecular biosynthesis.[15] This inhibits the progression of the enzyme topoisomerase II, which unwinds DNA for transcription. Doxorubicin stabilizes the topoisomerase II complex after it has broken the DNA chain for replication, preventing the DNA double helix from being resealed and thereby stopping the process of replication.
The planar aromatic chromophore portion of the molecule intercalates between two base pairs of the DNA, while the six-membered daunosamine sugar sits in the minor groove and interacts with flanking base pairs immediately adjacent to the intercalation site, as evidenced by several crystal structures.[16][17]
Clinical use
Doxorubicin is commonly used to treat some leukemias, Hodgkin's lymphoma, as well as cancers of the bladder, breast, stomach, lung, ovaries, thyroid, soft tissue sarcoma, multiple myeloma, and others.[2] Commonly used doxorubicin-containing regimens are AC (Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide), TAC (Taxotere, CA), ABVD (Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine), BEACOPP, CHOP (Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, Vincristine, Prednisone) and FAC (5-Fluorouracil, Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide). Doxil is used primarily for the treatment of ovarian cancer where the disease has progressed or recurred after platinum-based chemotherapy, or for the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma.[18]
Experimental therapy
Combination therapy experiments with sirolimus (rapamycin) and doxorubicin have shown promise in treating Akt-positive lymphomas in mice.[19]
Recent animal research coupling a murine monoclonal antibody with doxorubicin has created an immunoconjugate that was able to eliminate HIV-1 infection in mice. Current treatment with antiretroviral therapy (ART) still leaves pockets of HIV within the host. The immunoconjugate could potentially provide a complementary treatment to ART to eradicate antigen-expressing T cells.[20]
Liposomal formulations
Doxil is a pegylated (polyethylene glycol coated) liposome-encapsulated form of doxorubicin made by Ben Venue Laboratories for Johnson & Johnson in the United States. It was developed to treat Kaposi's sarcoma, an AIDS-related cancer that causes lesions to grow under the skin, in the lining of the mouth, nose and throat, or in other organs. The polyethylene glycol coating results in preferential concentration of Doxil in the skin. However, this also results in a side effect called palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE), more commonly known as hand-foot syndrome. Following administration of Doxil, small amounts of the drug can leak from capillaries in the palms of the hands and soles of the feet. The result of this leakage is redness, tenderness, and peeling of the skin that can be uncomfortable and even painful. In clinical testing at 50mg/m2 dosing every 4 weeks, 50.6% of patients treated with Doxil developed Hand-Foot Syndrome. The prevalence of this side effect limits the Doxil dose that can be given as compared with doxorubicin in the same treatment regimen, thereby limiting potential substitution. Substitution would be desirable because liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin is less cardiotoxic than unencapsulated doxorubicin. Doxil is also approved by the FDA for treatment of ovarian cancer and multiple myeloma. Outside the United States, Doxil is known as Caelyx and is marketed by Schering-Plough.
Myocet is a non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin made by Enzon Pharmaceuticals for Cephalon in Europe and for Sopherion Therapeutics in the United States and Canada. Myocet is approved in Europe and Canada for treatment of metastatic breast cancer in combination with cyclophosphamide, but is not yet approved by the FDA for use in the United States. It is currently being studied by Sopherion Therapeutics in a pivotal phase III global registrational trial in concurrent combination with Herceptin (trastuzumab) and Taxol (paclitaxel) for treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Unlike Doxil, the Myocet liposome does not have a polyethylene glycol coating and therefore does not result in the same prevalence of hand-foot Syndrome. The minimization of this side effect may allow for 1 for 1 substitution with doxorubicin in the same treatment regimen, thereby improving safety with no loss of efficacy. Like Doxil, the liposomal encapsulation of the doxorubicin limits the cardiotoxicity. In theory, by limiting the cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin through liposomal encapsulation, it can be used safely in concurrent combination with other cardiotoxic chemotherapy drugs, such as Herceptin. There is an FDA black box warning that Herceptin cannot be used in concurrent combination with doxorubicin, only in sequential combination. Though concurrent combination of Herceptin and doxorubicin in clinical studies found superior tumor response, the combination resulted in unacceptable cardiotoxicity, including risk of cardiac failure manifesting as CHF. Published phase II study results have shown that Myocet, Herceptin, and Taxol can safely be used concurrently without the cardiac risk, as measured by reduction in LVEF function, while still achieving superior tumor response. This finding is the basis for the on-going phase III trial for FDA approval.
[21][22]
Side effects
Acute side-effects of doxorubicin can include nausea, vomiting, and heart arrhythmias. It can also cause neutropenia (a decrease in white blood cells), as well as complete alopecia (hair loss). When the cumulative dose of doxorubicin reaches 550 mg/mē, the risks of developing cardiac side effects, including congestive heart failure, dilated cardiomyopathy, and death, dramatically increase. Doxorubicin cardiotoxicity is characterized by a dose-dependent decline in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Reactive oxygen species, generated by the interaction of doxorubicin with iron, can then damage the myocytes (heart cells), causing myofibrillar loss and cytoplasmic vacuolization. Additionally, some patients may develop palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia, or, "hand-foot syndrome," characterized by skin eruptions on the palms of the hand or soles of the feet, characterized by swelling, pain and erythema [18].
Due to these side effects and its red color, doxorubicin has earned the nickname "red devil"[23] or "red death."[24]
Doxorubucin can also cause reactivation of hepatitis B.[citation needed]
See also
References
- ^ Laginha, K.M. "Determination of Doxorubicin Levels in Whole Tumor and Tumor Nuclei in Murine Breast Cancer Tumors." Clinical Cancer Research. October 1, 2005. Vol. 11 (19). Retrieved on April 19, 2007.
- ^ a b "Doxorubicin (Systemic)." Mayo Clinic. Last updated on: June 15, 1999. Retrieved on April 19, 2007.
- ^ a b Weiss, Raymond B. "The Anthracyclines: Will We Ever Find a Better Doxorubicin?" Seminars in Oncology. Vol. 19, No. 6. December 1992. pp. 670686. PMID 1462166.
- ^ Tan, C.; Tasaka, H.; Kou-Ping, Y.; et al. Daunomycin, An Antitumor Antibiotic, In the Treatment of Neoplastic Disease. Clinical Evaluation with Special Reference to Childhood Leukemia. 1967, Cancer, 20, 333 353. PMID 4290058.
- ^ Arcamone, F.; Cassinelli, G.; Fantini, G.; et al. Adriamycin, 14-hydroxydaunomycin, A New Antitumor Antibiotic from S. peucetius var. caesius. 1969, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 11, 1101 1110. PMID 5365804.
- ^ Di Marco, A.; Gaetani, M.; Scarpinato, B. Adriamycin (NSC-123,127): A New Antibiotic with Antitumor Activity. 1969, Cancer Chemotherapy Reports, 53, 33 37. PMID 5772652.
- ^ a b Lomovskaya N, Otten SL, Doi-Katayama Y, et al. (1999). "Doxorubicin overproduction in Streptomyces peucetius: cloning and characterization of the dnrU ketoreductase and dnrV genes and the doxA cytochrome P-450 hydroxylase gene". J. Bacteriol. 181 (1): 30518. PMID 9864344.
- ^ Arcamone F, Cassinelli G, Fantini G, et al. (1969). "Adriamycin, 14-hydroxydaunomycin, a new antitumor antibiotic from S. peucetius var. caesius". Biotechnol. Bioeng. 11 (6): 110110. doi:10.1002/bit.260110607. PMID 5365804.
- ^ Grimm A, Madduri K, Ali A, Hutchinson CR (1994). "Characterization of the Streptomyces peucetius ATCC 29050 genes encoding doxorubicin polyketide synthase". Gene 151 (12): 110. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(94)90625-4. PMID 7828855.
- ^ Dickens ML, Strohl WR (1996). "Isolation and characterization of a gene from Streptomyces sp. strain C5 that confers the ability to convert daunomycin to doxorubicin on Streptomyces lividans TK24". J. Bacteriol. 178 (11): 338995. PMID 8655530.
- ^ Walczak RJ, Dickens ML, Priestley ND, Strohl WR (1999). "Purification, properties, and characterization of recombinant Streptomyces sp. strain C5 DoxA, a cytochrome P-450 catalyzing multiple steps in doxorubicin biosynthesis". J. Bacteriol. 181 (1): 298304. PMID 9864343.
- ^ Hutchinson CR, Colombo AL (1999). "Genetic engineering of doxorubicin production in Streptomyces peucetius: a review". J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23 (1): 64752. doi:10.1038/sj.jim.2900673. PMID 10455495.
- ^ Lown JW (1993). "Anthracycline and anthraquinone anticancer agents: current status and recent developments". Pharmacol. Ther. 60 (2): 185214. doi:10.1016/0163-7258(93)90006-Y. PMID 8022857.
- ^ Fornari, F.A.; Randolph, J.K.; Yalowich, J.C.; Ritke, M.K.; Gewirtz, D.A. Interference by Doxorubicin with DNA Unwinding in MCF-7 Breast Tumor Cells. 1994, Molecular Pharmacology, 45, 649 656. PMID 8183243.
- ^ Momparler, R.L.; Karon, M.; Siegel, S.E.; Avila, F. Effect of Adriamycin on DNA, RNA and Protein Synthesis in Cell-Free Systems and Intact Cells. 1976, Cancer Research, 36, 2891 2895. PMID 1277199. Free full text
- ^ Frederick, C.A.; Williams, L.D.; Ughetto, G.; van der Marel, G.A.; van Boom, J.H.; Rich, A.; Wang, A.H. Structural Comparison of Anticancer Drug-DNA Complexes: Adriamycin and Daunomycin. 1990, Biochemistry, 29, 2538 2549. PMID 2334681. Crystal structure is available for download as a PDB file.
- ^ Pigram, W.J.; Fuller, W.; Hamilton, L.D. Stereochemistry of Intercalation: Interaction of Daunomycin with DNA. 1972, Nature New Biology, 235, 17 19. PMID 4502404.
- ^ a b "DOXIL Product Information." Ortho Biotech Products, L.P. Retrieved on April 19, 2007.
- ^ Wendel H, De Stanchina E, Fridman J, Malina A, Ray S, Kogan S, Cordon-Cardo C, Pelletier J, Lowe S (2004). "Survival signalling by Akt and eIF4E in oncogenesis and cancer therapy". Nature 428 (6980): 3327. doi:10.1038/nature02369. PMID 15029198.
- ^ Johansson S, Goldenberg D, Griffiths G, Wahren B, Hinkula J (2006). "Elimination of HIV-1 infection by treatment with a doxorubicin-conjugated anti-envelope antibody". AIDS 20 (15): 19111915. doi:10.1097/01.aids.0000247111.58961.60. PMID 16988511.
- ^ Cancerbackup: Liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx, Myocet)
- ^ Chemocare: Doxorubicin liposomal
- ^ Bloch, Richard; Bloch, Annette. "25 Most Asked Questions". Fighting Cancer. R. A. Bloch Cancer Foundation. http://www.blochcancer.org/fighting/chap13.html. Retrieved 2007-06-28.
- ^ Groopman, Jerome E. (2007). How Doctors Think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. p. 49. ISBN 0-618-61003-0.
External links
Return to Top Start a New Discussion About this Drug
This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GFDL (GNU Free Documentation License) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caelyx
This information has been independently compiled and is for educational purposes only. It is not intended to be a substitute for face to face medical advice from a qualified healthcare professional. Please remember that the content within this community is totally compiled by users of this site. Our website displays many pages which do not contain any medical information regarding the drug name stated. These pages are only provided for the purpose of opening community discussions about that drug by our users. For more details please see the Disclaimer. This data is Copyright © 2005-2009 PrescriptionDrug-Info.com and is protected under U.S. and International Copyright laws. All Rights Reserved.
drug_details.asp Last Updated November 9 2009
|
Home Page
Post Your Story or Question
Follow Us On Twitter
Registered Community Experts
Topics Submitted 
Prescription Drug Forums 
Top 200 Prescription Drugs
Drugs by Category
Recent FDA Approvals
November 2009 Health News
Advertising & Contact Details
About the Community
Medical Disclaimer
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Make Us Your Home Page
Bookmark this Page 
Recent Topics
Ku 108
Hydrocodone White M357
Pfizer Vgr 100
Pitchers
Hifenacp
Purple M Z 2
Idrofos 150
G221 300
Hih Na
Hih
Contraceptive
Round Yellow Pill 255
Abortion Pills
S191
Chlorophenamin
Cyclopam Suspension
Yellow Pill With M On One Side C 13 On Other Side
White A 0 7
5683 30
Medicines To Start Periods
Dilaudid
Pain Killer
Erceflora
Lh84
M 312 Blue
Ingredients Doxycycline
Cloraz Dipot
White Pill With A264 On One Side
Hydroxyzine
Lotronex
|